<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Symptom Advice .com &#187; applicability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://symptomadvice.com/tag/applicability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://symptomadvice.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 22:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Classification Of Sphincter Of Oddi Dysfunction</title>
		<link>http://symptomadvice.com/new-classification-of-sphincter-of-oddi-dysfunction/</link>
		<comments>http://symptomadvice.com/new-classification-of-sphincter-of-oddi-dysfunction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Symptom Advice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pancreatic symptoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathological syndrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://symptomadvice.com/new-classification-of-sphincter-of-oddi-dysfunction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted &#111;&#110;: Monday, 31 January 2011, 14:00 CST Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) &#105;&#115; a pathological syndrome &#116;&#104;&#097;&#116; &#105;&#115; &#117;&#115;&#117;&#097;&#108;&#108;&#121; classified into the biliary type or the pancreatic type &#097;&#099;&#099;&#111;&#114;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#116;&#111; the Milwaukee criteria. However, this classification &#104;&#097;&#115; some drawbacks in clinical practice, some of which result in flawed classification &#097;&#110;&#100; failure &#116;&#111; properly guide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://symptomadvice.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/1298214010-59.jpg%3Fw%3D300%26h%3D400" style="float:left;clear:both;margin:0 15px 15px 0" />
<p>Posted &#111;&#110;: Monday, 31 January 2011, 14:00 CST </p>
<p>Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) &#105;&#115; a pathological syndrome &#116;&#104;&#097;&#116; &#105;&#115; &#117;&#115;&#117;&#097;&#108;&#108;&#121; classified into the biliary type or the pancreatic type &#097;&#099;&#099;&#111;&#114;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#116;&#111; the Milwaukee criteria. However, this classification &#104;&#097;&#115; some drawbacks in clinical practice, some of which result in flawed classification &#097;&#110;&#100; failure &#116;&#111; properly guide diagnosis &#097;&#110;&#100; treatment.</p>
<p>A research article published &#111;&#110; January 21, 2011 in the World Journal of Gastroenterology addresses this question. The authors proposed a new classification system &#102;&#111;&#114; SOD &#097;&#099;&#099;&#111;&#114;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#116;&#111; anatomy, symptoms, endoscope tests &#097;&#110;&#100; radiological imaging, i.e. SOD &#105;&#115; divided into &#102;&#111;&#117;&#114; types &#105;&#110;&#115;&#116;&#101;&#097;&#100; of &#116;&#119;&#111; types: the biliary-type, the pancreatic-type, the double-duct type &#097;&#110;&#100; the biliary-pancreatic reflux type. The new classification demonstrates significant advantages &#102;&#111;&#114; guiding the diagnosis &#097;&#110;&#100; treatment of SOD patients in China, &#097;&#115; compared with the conventional Milwaukee criteria.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, further investigations &#111;&#110; the applicability of this quaternary classification system &#116;&#111; patients in other regions &#097;&#114;&#101; needed.</p>
<ul>
<li>World Journal of Gastroenterology</li>
</ul>
<p>More News in this Category</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://symptomadvice.com/new-classification-of-sphincter-of-oddi-dysfunction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
