<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Symptom Advice .com &#187; screening mammography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://symptomadvice.com/tag/screening-mammography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://symptomadvice.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 22:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breast cancer screening less accurate in survivors</title>
		<link>http://symptomadvice.com/breast-cancer-screening-less-accurate-in-survivors/</link>
		<comments>http://symptomadvice.com/breast-cancer-screening-less-accurate-in-survivors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Symptom Advice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cancer symptoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer survivors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal of the american medical association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammograms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening mammography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://symptomadvice.com/breast-cancer-screening-less-accurate-in-survivors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK (Reuters Health) &#8211; Screening mammography &#105;&#115; &#108;&#101;&#115;&#115; accurate at spotting breast cancer if &#097; woman has had the disease before, &#097;&#099;&#099;&#111;&#114;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#116;&#111; &#097; &#110;&#101;&#119; government-funded study. Breast cancer survivors are &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; &#108;&#105;&#107;&#101;&#108;&#121; &#116;&#111; develop &#110;&#101;&#119; tumors &#116;&#104;&#097;&#110; women &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#116; &#097; history of breast cancer, but &#108;&#105;&#116;&#116;&#108;&#101; &#105;&#115; known &#097;&#098;&#111;&#117;&#116; screening in &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; group. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://symptomadvice.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/1298720049-98.jpg" style="clear:both;clear:both;margin:0 15px 15px 0;width:500px" />
<p>NEW YORK (Reuters Health) &ndash; Screening mammography &#105;&#115; &#108;&#101;&#115;&#115; accurate at spotting breast cancer if &#097; woman has had the disease before, &#097;&#099;&#099;&#111;&#114;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#116;&#111; &#097; &#110;&#101;&#119; government-funded study.</p>
<p>Breast cancer survivors are &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; &#108;&#105;&#107;&#101;&#108;&#121; &#116;&#111; develop &#110;&#101;&#119; tumors &#116;&#104;&#097;&#110; women &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#116; &#097; history of breast cancer, but &#108;&#105;&#116;&#116;&#108;&#101; &#105;&#115; known &#097;&#098;&#111;&#117;&#116; screening in &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; group.</p>
<p>The &#110;&#101;&#119; results, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, are based &#111;&#110; information from the &#108;&#097;&#114;&#103;&#101;&#115;&#116; mammography registry in the U.S.</p>
<p>They show screening does &#104;&#101;&#108;&#112; detect breast cancer in survivors, &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; 7 cancers found &#112;&#101;&#114; 1,000 screens compared &#116;&#111; 4 &#112;&#101;&#114; 1,000 screens in women who &#110;&#101;&#118;&#101;&#114; had the disease.</p>
<p>But the procedure also missed tumors 11 percent &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; often in the survivors, &#101;&#118;&#101;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#103;&#104; these women had higher numbers of extra x-rays and other radiology tests done &#097;&#102;&#116;&#101;&#114; their mammograms.</p>
<p>Survivors &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; also one percent &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; &#108;&#105;&#107;&#101;&#108;&#121; &#116;&#111; &#098;&#101; told the mammogram &#109;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#116; &#098;&#101; showing &#097; cancer, when the woman &#097;&#099;&#116;&#117;&#097;&#108;&#108;&#121; didn&#039;t &#104;&#097;&#118;&#101; the disease.</p>
<p>&quot;These findings and additional studies that are &#108;&#105;&#107;&#101;&#108;&#121; &#116;&#111; &#098;&#101; stimulated from &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; report &#115;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#108;&#100; lead &#116;&#111; improved (radiology routines)&quot; for breast cancer survivors, screening expert Robert &#097;. Smith of the American Cancer Society (ACS) said in &#097; statement.</p>
<p>About one in &#101;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#116; American women will develop breast cancer during their lifetime, but the chance of dying from the disease has &#098;&#101;&#101;&#110; dropping &#114;&#101;&#099;&#101;&#110;&#116;&#108;&#121; and &#105;&#115; now &#108;&#101;&#115;&#115; &#116;&#104;&#097;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#114;&#101;&#101; percent, &#097;&#099;&#099;&#111;&#114;&#100;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#116;&#111; the ACS.</p>
<p>Experts disagree &#097;&#098;&#111;&#117;&#116; when and how often women &#115;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#108;&#100; get mammograms. The ACS recommends &#111;&#110;&#099;&#101; &#097; year in women 40 and older, &#119;&#104;&#105;&#108;&#101; the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, &#097; federal expert panel, says &#111;&#110;&#099;&#101; &#101;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#121; two years in women over 50.</p>
<p>The &#110;&#101;&#119; study, led &#098;&#121; Dr. Les Irwig of the University of Sydney in Australia, was &#097; joint work of American and Australian researchers.</p>
<p>They compared &#097;&#110; equal number of screening mammograms &#8212; &#110;&#101;&#097;&#114;&#108;&#121; 120,000 altogether &#8212; from survivors and comparable women &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;&#111;&#117;&#116; &#097; history of breast cancer.</p>
<p>Within &#097; year of screening, 655 tumors &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; found in survivors, compared &#116;&#111; 342 in the other women.</p>
<p>Cancers detected &#098;&#121; symptoms, and &#110;&#111;&#116; screening, &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; &#116;&#104;&#097;&#110; twice &#097;&#115; common in survivors &#116;&#104;&#097;&#110; in the other women.</p>
<p>The ACS&#039;s Smith, who was &#110;&#111;&#116; involved in the study, said the findings underscore the &quot;importance of remaining vigilant &#097;&#098;&#111;&#117;&#116; &#110;&#101;&#119; symptoms and the importance of reporting breast &#099;&#104;&#097;&#110;&#103;&#101;&#115; immediately&quot; &#116;&#111; &#097; doctor.</p>
<p>The authors call for &#109;&#111;&#114;&#101; studies in breast cancer survivors &#8212; &#101;&#115;&#112;&#101;&#099;&#105;&#097;&#108;&#108;&#121; younger ones and those &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#118;&#101;&#114;&#121; dense breasts &#8212; &#097;&#115; &#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#105;&#115; no evidence &#115;&#111; &#102;&#097;&#114; that extra screening efforts in these women will improve their survival.</p>
<p>SOURCE: bit.ly/hdrHS9 JAMA/Journal of the American Medical Association, online February 22, 2011.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://symptomadvice.com/breast-cancer-screening-less-accurate-in-survivors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
